IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 16 March 2017 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BABF1273E2; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66c1hJSvWZTh; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0AC1296BA; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vkZSw4V4bz7bp; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:59:28 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1489683568; bh=3FjogsThbHkKuhCyYQ7ShJIb002FmOasOlwEPIWWrNI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VsIJcn1Vqx/k4gdD0WQK+9Eblg0nF8kwU+l4fNMfmJteZ6+3OQlbN8F0k14Vuvxb0 uiqsz5New6HG48bF9ClsJYKJTMlJKGjWI/jOWrzgDw53A4lro4DQPjY6owNmREeFAr +DPucvQk6iXri9ou3dm494ZfRiqs3nBcw9mlRvtc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IMZz8ycL2vb; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:59:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:59:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 863E239D3A6; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:59:26 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 863E239D3A6
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2A740ACF3C; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:59:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:59:26 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ipsec@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis@ietf.org, david.waltermire@nist.gov
In-Reply-To: <148962898085.14169.1591384545915810858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703161258190.32675@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <148962898085.14169.1591384545915810858.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/faRBX3ci-5T_504OS175cUz_eLA>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:59:36 -0000

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Ben Campbell wrote:

> Section 2.1, 2nd to last paragraph says that ENCR_3DES has been
> downgraded to SHOULD NOT. But both the table in this section, and the
> change table later in the draft say MAY.

Oops, that's a big bug this late in the game!!

We will have to do another update with the table fixed. I do believe
the text is correct and 3DES is classified as SHOULD NOT.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email