IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 09 March 2010 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A12B3A68C9 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 03:54:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aq5fcgYPoke0 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 03:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70AB3A68EA for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 03:53:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o29Brcsd027194; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:53:38 +0200 (IST)
X-CheckPoint: {4B96353F-0-1B201DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:53:58 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: 'Keith Welter' <welterk@us.ibm.com>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:53:58 +0200
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
Thread-Index: Acq+2vthQ2usCBK4RzON7JP7wa5ZgQApBw7g
Message-ID: <006FEB08D9C6444AB014105C9AEB133FB37650C505@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <OFE95BCCD7.8E4A6F0F-ON882576E0.00590B57-882576E0.00597F3C@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFE95BCCD7.8E4A6F0F-ON882576E0.00590B57-882576E0.00597F3C@us.ibm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:54:17 -0000

To me it’s pretty obviously the former, although the latter is also true.

________________________________________
From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Keith Welter
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 6:18 PM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08


Section 2.23, paragraph starting: 
"An initiator can use port 4500 for both IKE and ESP, regardless of 
 whether or not there is a NAT, even at the beginning of IKE.". 

What does, "even at the beginning of IKE" mean? 

Does it mean, 
  "even when sending an IKE_SA_INIT request" 
or 
  "even at any point during the initial exchanges"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email