IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 July 2015 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E551B2B4C for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 00:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBgf2V78H-uD for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 00:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF101B2B3B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 00:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgjx7 with SMTP id x7so28804263wgj.2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=OQ2/EneYSUJfN1lINWXz1wvFdqbrnoUzj7Cx9XHT49s=; b=bAHdq70atUwR8R+PoL/Thivf1VL4W8oMMY1zfrM7+rKHfzw6npwfWMxwpHplD+lh6+ Zw12WdJFmZ0DkkTc0538QFjjYNWEBJgmBQ+Nr9nwWL8GmbH22cOn1FSX8J6IfDG4oIGv UipedKZv/6fJscLunCXKIpOCHny7fcRqYNP7otEcFBE95LbgXngFJez9Fdts/fyp47r+ tBYqyUmkMKWY0ChW6HK1Zlk9WWk/0luGUJJuc+x9mobLI06p0CtLeSy64bz9RvzLsiNI 99w2iG3ip9flqtOIvQq7E3TG+TgzDQxCuAGsyRjrxtvyPIBGpTEvTndMEoP7J3Cr8NOm Z7/g==
X-Received: by 10.194.22.105 with SMTP id c9mr49323720wjf.120.1435736283739; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.250.253] ([194.29.32.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pd7sm1509794wjb.27.2015.07.01.00.38.02 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_819D17BF-7417-4844-883A-789E9796A67B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH6jnUcn2r9eFPTCEGiJQMGNW80nP7Hc9LrEZGwGGauB4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:37:58 +0300
Message-Id: <05E515E7-040B-4CA9-8536-0E0F6E14B60B@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH6jnUcn2r9eFPTCEGiJQMGNW80nP7Hc9LrEZGwGGauB4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/gl4DNYpUWNRoIbkv3CX4dN169cU>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:38:07 -0000

Hi, Kathleen.

The sentences in question are the ones that get modified after IANA assignment. We’ve asked for early assignment. If we get it (hint, hint, Tero) I’ll update these sentences (“… MUST use 31, the identifier assigned by IANA to …”). If not, then the RFC editor makes these edits anyway.

Although I have asked (and got) the assignment for AEAD_CHACHA20_POLY1305, I’m still not clear on what it is for. The numbers in that registry aren’t every transmitted on the wire in any protocol.

Yoav

> On Jun 30, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am getting the ballot ready for the next telechat (next week on Thursday).  Are there any implementations?
> 
> My other question is to see if some more text is going to be added to distinguish AEAD_CHACHA20_POLY1305 from ENCR_CHACHA20_POLY1305.  I ask because this came up in 2 reviews.  While the definitions for both are in the draft and this should be clear enough, an added sentence could do some good to explain that they are different.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email