Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 January 2017 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB45129ED8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:01:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6D3oR3XMvxmK for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631BF129ECC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l7so40558464qtd.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:01:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wG2Nwe6iTbrk5HYs/eLuHKaib94F9/FURnCtpdvL1M4=; b=V5cskwHkdSpHv7omzzg9TiPkFFCY7nelEdN1VLMiRQ01jgv5UEGFwa6l9XGfDu6Fxw 2jnaYnDQdi1+pYGzKGHlGsbahiSo9z+6cYhkOAOcTercMFtF9NIwRukTr0G70N53xH3D vyRvLbUmeQW787B3nA12HV2ahqMfsxlozs9i1E6NHk41czuOlXlsj+BGZbUL8+8SITV0 Uj/JrjxKOG+NhsNJnQqCDLHC2vPxQntaNVWCEVTRybH/aQOj6nHcyi8K1I76etptdEPA a1yBxrygWvW1VMSJoULbpM8VcmPkeLHxYCV1BCchzbJufF0jvK6+QwxsfDGj8lDxtbN/ 1qfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wG2Nwe6iTbrk5HYs/eLuHKaib94F9/FURnCtpdvL1M4=; b=GaRvgxYMBa/eqenOB1wMzjMlWAKJWVNyB4sgBFbE6h5ML8yVW4KBg2LYf6ps9uk59x 4yfYMJY7TAvYTPBV5WTEJVZ2wUSf6u5J2ZrdA9E3FmRF8zLGaFqmbzS0CVo8M0KNZBx9 FQNYK4l/wOQpuMEQ4UmphU+tb5gczQ3RkiXoe19s6HSznhQm4HBwssT5fM/MdK75Smfm T7zmBgzjxMyu+eAeLE7nsrJjDHp9T61o/06KqEE/toOIbiqrjUM+swKzS5NeTpFDrCUm WyR+LGF53TdiROrWtjHXyJgrDmc5G0n7P5HnF4LDcfXHi4Sz9kXwP4YGAb5xgnL/Wb/d uGmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+fDYauBuyo3rctjPWd1X8lHgH4gQBxz30brUiwWwt17NOip3g/PmW5LfxJAAdTLP9XyxfuQDB5iYWfA==
X-Received: by 10.200.43.166 with SMTP id m35mr80495113qtm.261.1483736469352; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:01:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.161.101 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:01:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1701061555210.2069@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAHbuEH4pqTK-kc65FVh98X-t+YsVe+9=J7_PjB8hESsY+5=-PQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612121254150.14930@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHbuEH4MgqDpWR_yc21Z8-HNU1Pvy8Hyz0NvW9qntwtxFuZmmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7RROEheNbAJ9RpE+V8TiP1DYa92CbXEMQcas7wDUoYKg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1701061555210.2069@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:01:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH46LQ=rk4aTqcbCa+=De5HPwbGBRQQOCzdV0tB0pz1wfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145ecfc323908054573515d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/glNktI0AJLVbc8vUGve6Wl2PEMg>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:01:12 -0000
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > I never got an answer as to whether or not I should wait on the last call, >> so I pushed it through. No comments >> came in during the holiday period. Should last call be extended? Or >> does the WG feel the reason was because the >> document is ready? If the latter then I'll get it ready for an IESG >> telechat. I'd prefer to put it on 2/2/2017 >> as there are already a fair number of documents on the telechat in 2 >> weeks. >> > > If you schedule it for 2/2 then I guess we can give people another two > weeks for comments? Although I'm not sure if that means we will get > more comments :) I'm not sure we'll get more either. Is 2/2 okay or is there any rush for this draft? Thanks! > > > Paul > -- Best regards, Kathleen
- [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc43… Waltermire, David A. (Fed)