Re: Path MTU Discovery
Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net> Sat, 08 February 1997 09:09 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id EAA24709 for ipsec-outgoing; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 04:09:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702071930.TAA01491@inner.net>
To: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
cc: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Path MTU Discovery
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Feb 1997 22:47:21 EST." <9702070347.AA07084@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
X-Copyright: Copyright 1997, Craig Metz, All Rights Reserved.
X-Reposting: With explicit permission only
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 14:30:42 -0500
From: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
In message <9702070347.AA07084@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>, you write: >Another point is that fragmentation checking should be done before any >IPsec handling takes place (easier and faster). All IPsec processing must be done above fragmentation. -Craig
- Path MTU Discovery Angelos D. Keromytis
- RE: Path MTU Discovery Sanjay Anand
- RE: Path MTU Discovery Stephen Kent
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Dan McDonald
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Dan McDonald
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Craig Metz
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Ran Atkinson
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Dan McDonald
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Ben Rogers
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Oliver Spatscheck
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Ran Atkinson
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Ran Atkinson
- Re: Path MTU Discovery Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re[2]: Path MTU Discovery Whelan, Bill