Re: [IPsec] Issue #177. (was: HA/LS terminology)

"Melinda Shore" <shore@arsc.edu> Tue, 23 March 2010 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <shore@arsc.edu>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D353A6CBB for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.431
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TxBfcg1udMlr for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arsc.edu (mail1.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:75::229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4BD3A6891 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.arsc.edu (web4.arsc.edu [199.165.84.246]) by arsc.edu (20090828.ARSC) with ESMTP id o2NLVrdl019086; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:31:53 -0800 (AKDT)
Received: from 2001:df8:0:24:225:d3ff:fed5:7b05 by webmail.arsc.edu with HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:31:57 -0800 (ADT)
Message-ID: <1eac10bbf0fee9817dbc4c681868daa2.squirrel@webmail.arsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1699285A-BDB7-40A6-BA58-5228AAE1133A@checkpoint.com>
References: <7EF09073-9D20-4077-A8DD-59B84B1732D0@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <7bc30fde97954c9f651eb436c822dab7.squirrel@webmail.arsc.edu> <118D7A1E-6090-4D71-9FEB-89AEB189CA94@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <1699285A-BDB7-40A6-BA58-5228AAE1133A@checkpoint.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:31:57 -0800 (ADT)
From: "Melinda Shore" <shore@arsc.edu>
To: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@checkpoint.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=199.165.84.246; country=US; region=AK; city=Fairbanks; postalcode=99775; latitude=64.8834; longitude=-147.4984; metrocode=745; areacode=907; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=64.8834,-147.4984&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 199.165.84.167
Cc: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Issue #177. (was: HA/LS terminology)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:31:59 -0000

On Tue, March 23, 2010 1:20 pm, Yoav Nir wrote:
> - For the cluster with just one member doing IKE and IPsec, I propose
> "hot-standby cluster"
> - For the cluster with several members doing IKE and IPsec, I propose to
> keep "load-sharing cluster"

I think "failover" is in broader use than "hot standby"
and would tend to prefer it myself, but I think either is clear.

Melinda