IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks

Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> Thu, 20 December 2012 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Johannes.Merkle@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3F421F8623 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLfq+ht7Xjie for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECF221F8980 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C23D1A008E; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:05:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from mail-srv1.secumail.de (unknown [10.53.40.200]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5A81A008C; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:05:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.208.1.73] ([10.208.1.73]) by mail-srv1.secumail.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:05:41 +0100
Message-ID: <50D31B35.8090104@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:05:41 +0100
From: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <50C62D6A.8010709@gmail.com> <5808c090d8485cc6698829b522fade80.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E6940@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <50C9B0B5.9090600@secunet.com> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E71FE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <a5622369ac2e85b8b04cefea05c832b8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <20691.6156.393731.420290@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20691.6156.393731.420290@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2012 14:05:41.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[189DFC70:01CDDEBB]
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:05:45 -0000

>
> I.e. make the document define the generic ideas in the body, make IANA
> considerations section to add the note field to the IANA registry,
> which specifies this RFC and subsection in it for each group.
> 
Which way to prefer for the "new" EC groups, i.e. the Brainpool I-Ds from Dan and me?
1. Also include references to these I-D in the draft IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
2. Include a note in the IANA section of each Brainpool I-D to add for these curves a reference to the corresponding
section of the DH-checks RFC?

Johannes

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status