IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-aux-02.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 03 December 2018 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D0B12D4F2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 05:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NzlI6pgRanSK for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 05:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BD412870E for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 05:48:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437mYc1MTwzFdX; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:48:52 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1543844932; bh=TrVGcl5K44yMaGmzdRB4DELJGk2Ovg+SxoTtg/T8jps=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=fT5Y7X61tyKkD8eDlKTWmRsryvu3bY0L7ys9OY5EMUD3Ix5Sok1pcwdBf196am2vX j+8kUVc4YbF4CpSnuRHEaQN94G4CvlMcZthgkIbxHLxBsUNWjfwmNHip89I+PyLOeL QSb7uxSFKchVCgvAapU3pmYQLULKuiK8I2UHlVXI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdmWXOCt1mnU; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:48:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:48:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5182C12EAE4; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:48:49 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 5182C12EAE4
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5840D37F8; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:48:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 08:48:49 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <01d301d48b09$5fe4e570$1faeb050$@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812030843140.27847@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <154384180519.18304.6269496079887828694.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <01d301d48b09$5fe4e570$1faeb050$@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/hIxLzIKPUnfdbdixY1-ccPdCurA>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-aux-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 13:48:57 -0000

On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, Valery Smyslov wrote:

> I've submitted a new version of the draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-aux. Major changes:
>
> 1. The exchange is renamed from IKE_AUX to INTERMEDIATE (thanks Tommy!).
>    I believe this name reflects its purpose, it's easy to pronounce and hard to mix
>     with existing exchanges.

It is missing the prefix IKE_ ?

In my opinion, IKE_SA_INIT / IKE_AUTH should have been named
consistenly, eg either IKE_SA_INIT / IKE_SA_AUTH or IKE_INIT / IKE_AUTH

So in that light, this would be better as IKE_INTERMEDIATE

INFORMATIONAL should have been IKE_INFORMATIONAL, and CREATE_CHILD_SA
is an abomination to act either on IKE or CHILD SA without seperating
its exchange :)

But if people insist on INTERMEDIATE, I won't complain further.
Consistency is already lost so it is time to stop painting :)

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email