IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: replay field size

Germano Caronni <caronni@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Wed, 12 February 1997 15:05 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa29335; 12 Feb 97 10:05 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13319; 12 Feb 97 10:05 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id JAA26237 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 09:54:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Germano Caronni <caronni@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Message-Id: <199702121457.PAA18846@kom30.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: replay field size
To: ipsec@tis.com
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:57:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <9702121359.AA02547@dana.checkpoint.com> from "Roy Shamir" at Feb 12, 97 03:59:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP7]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

straw poll

> Should AH and ESP both have a fixed size replay counter ? (Yes/No/Don't Care)
> 
 Yes.
 
> If they have a fixed size counter, what size should it be? (32 bits/64 bits)
 
 32 bits.
 
> Should SHA-1 output be truncated to 128 bits from 160 bits ? (Yes/No/Don't Care) 
> 
 Yes, truncate to 128.


Germano Caronni

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status