Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal
Fri, 20 September 1996 11:59 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa24728; 20 Sep 96 7:59 EDT
Received: from neptune.hq.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07618; 20 Sep 96 7:59 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa21486; 20 Sep 96 7:31 EDT
Subject: Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal
To: ipsec@tis.com
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 14:59:46 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9609191751.AA18970@dcl.MIT.EDU> from "Theodore Y. Ts'o" at Sep
Message-ID: <150853350997.30702.14309070239661120624.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
19, 96 01:51:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP5] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com Precedence: bulk From: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com Message-ID: <9609200726.aa21481@neptune.TIS.COM> > Well, the problem is that any time the minutes say anything good or bad > about either protocol, people are going to claim that the minutes aren't > "fair". The problem is that the minutes don't describe what happened at the meeting, which is what they're supposed to do. We're more than happy to debate the merits of our protocol, but minutes should accurately and fairly records what happens at the meetings -- not provide the chair's opinions. The minutes are not a forum where differences of opinion are somehow resolved. They're supposed to be an accurate record of what took place at the meeting. > According to the ISAKMP camp, saying that SKIP "only" takes 2 > messages is a skewed, slanted view. If someone had presented that at the meeting, yes, that should be in the minutes.
- IPsec Minutes from Montreal PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal John Gilmore
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal Ashar Aziz
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal ipsec-approval
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal Ashar Aziz
- Re: IPsec Minutes from Montreal Ashar Aziz