Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents

"Carl F. Muckenhirn" <cfm@columbia.sparta.com> Mon, 17 June 1996 22:13 UTC

Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa18848; 17 Jun 96 18:13 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id SAA25401; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 18:15:31 -0400
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025395; Mon, 17 Jun 96 18:15:02 -0400
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA08816; Mon, 17 Jun 96 18:15:01 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id SAA25392; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 18:15:01 -0400
Received: from bugs_bunny.columbia.sparta.com(157.185.80.205) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025387; Mon, 17 Jun 96 18:14:59 -0400
Received: from [157.185.80.136] (blackbird.columbia.SPARTA.COM) by columbia.sparta.com (4.1/cfm-7-21-95) id AA26876; Mon, 17 Jun 96 18:17:06 EDT
Message-Id: <v02140b02adeb898bd42b@[157.185.80.136]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 18:17:21 -0400
To: Jim Thompson <jim@smallworks.com>
From: "Carl F. Muckenhirn" <cfm@columbia.sparta.com>
Subject: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Cc: "Carl F. Muckenhirn" <cfm@columbia.sparta.com>, "C. Harald Koch" <chk@border.com>, ipsec@TIS.COM
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

At 4:31 PM 6/17/96, Jim Thompson wrote:
>I'm not an IP lawyer (though we have one who works here), but this
>
>> Both network ports have the same network address, making the device
>transparent
>> to the local area network in which it is spliced. The device operates by
>> selectively encrypting or decrypting only the data portion of a data packet,
>> leaving the routing information contained in the header and  trailer portions
>> of the data packet unchanged.
>
>Would seem to leave IPsec in the free and clear (so to speak.)
>
>Jim

Pointing this out reminds me of a "non-military" application. The "Bump in
the Stack Encryptor" by Steve Bellovin (et al, I just can't remember who al
is). A few years back provides exactly this functionality.

carl.