Re: [IPsec] IETF114 scheduling
Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 June 2022 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1F1C13CDB1 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwznRyuB6_Pu for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED281C14F739 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id s27so1158292pga.13 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dvorz3gYFF+Bw0iga1rUE03f78tmEe2vq46lMoIqGOU=; b=K5ZWL2UVPid69hSwDnQliKCvnwnQazy5IlDbUwd2NXHl7Jnaai9OvdWELjovK5Z1tE cFppeGxjKBvWpjwjSqXepHhkKMaAh4DNZrFvDPCh79eUD66mJMi3dHxjkWmUm9jiw7zs BtIXVtlbRGFqG4FPcJN65Cbvgwu6LnTQrA78XpSWmdOIEyn/HrmPh0rXNSXQga1zIdEb X/hO6cjGKI37p1vZA4IHqKGiEUmS3ZWGCy1zQd3qDecgjRMUmUO6prx+7OE1n6rdiY9N 76Y3+1i+hAqJXeRtYx7ZngBCWOhgRzESHnRFUibYTn1FszqG08EU5tW1b9k3Et8uiJ90 91Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dvorz3gYFF+Bw0iga1rUE03f78tmEe2vq46lMoIqGOU=; b=mrqaIP5crOrxlqcCMIJSpXXxPuKhDDHnkIAtevA2XFjJGSCcj5wbEhfuerf4H0yHA1 pCcc1N9pJG7ZsP1eYqUii9lYC7feO6JejyFNBbk49I1J4VbJsHW8kLPssiZcyOphNLyW ojMgXom69GuezELeAbJYvWkRhRjpVHsKR4qcS1pmJmnbY0i34krhSVS/ta8vleXWkCG/ owkoBkRahqtSUtNgqWYVmvpViU72oTFPAOpd9lMefY+c8vbt9NTegdC41BcJysWguqGv t3jaCy1czENWD0YDZc6deee/1G4/mgdmovg/NGhHPJ4iMj39+B0QX//zIoN8X5gRihIa zAsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/L8IoIUaLDpWGuo1RiHOyIExiQacH6o96sIsemzuBHQrKibRWV 4+UIZKSY5Yql08j1c+cX5cZhQhgV/48g0JEgAqZZKcffpMw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t62n+YyASiZgXjQuHm0rOrPa7hgzRt+o8+qFJqK2fVu6A+Yn8TqMko37xbCU8+hTrKhFIG1aZZRRbW9XZUkeA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1a48:b0:522:9716:4e0a with SMTP id h8-20020a056a001a4800b0052297164e0amr15396310pfv.22.1656608467461; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5be1df0b-4669-4e92-7335-92f1f42a60e8@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <5be1df0b-4669-4e92-7335-92f1f42a60e8@htt-consult.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:00:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTknMqqMfHjdnY5j02tf5YwSa-EBPxjxAto_fwLuA496oyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003c2a4d05e2ad37c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/hnS6I06J6I4rjmHNok2G2qoETJU>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IETF114 scheduling
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:01:09 -0000
Hi, If time permits, I would be happy to present: * IKEv2 Downstream Fragmentation Notification Extension and * IKEv2 Count Based SA Extension Yours, Daniel On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 07:15 Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com> wrote: > Right now, ipsecme is slotted together with tls. > > I guess they assume no overlap of interest? :) > > I do have interest in both, provided there is discussion of diet-esp at > 114. > > I do have commitments working with the FAA on their TLS extension. > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
- [IPsec] IETF114 scheduling Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [IPsec] IETF114 scheduling Daniel Migault