[IPsec] IPsecME status update 2016-10-28

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 28 October 2016 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E64129AD2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tfc6BuOQAXLm for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5242E129ACC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u9SDqb9D009203 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.2/8.14.8/Submit) id u9SDqbKg012656; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:37 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22547.22565.329808.194716@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:52:37 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 2 min
X-Total-Time: 2 min
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/howOWVvepVhjFnIOBt0pNXd2nto>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [IPsec] IPsecME status update 2016-10-28
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:52:41 -0000

Agenda of IETF 97, Seoul posted:

	Tuesday, November 15, 2016
	13:30-15:30 	Tuesday Afternoon session I

	- Agenda bashing, adminstrivia - Chairs (5 min)
	- Status of ready WG drafts - Chairs (5 min)
	  (ddos-protection, safecurves, rfc4307bis, rfc7321bis)
	- Status of other WG items - Chairs / Authors (30 min)
	  tcp-encaps and split-dns - Pauly
	  eddsa and implicit-iv - Nir
	- PSS vs PKCS1 v1.5 interop issues - Valery Smyslov (15 min)
	- QR discussion (30 min)
	

Document Status:

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection (David)

  In RFC Editor Queue.

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves (Tero)

  Approved in the 2016-10-13 IESG telecat. Now in RFC Editor Queue. 

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis (David)

  WGLC period done, resulted some changes, should be ready to go
  forward. 

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis (David)

  Adopted as WG document, should be ready for WG LC. 

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-eddsa (Tero)

  I think this is still waiting for the curdle to decide for OID.
  No comments during WG adoptation call, adopted as WG document.

- draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps (Tero)

  This should also be ready for WGLC, waiting for Tero to review.

New work:

- Quantum Resistance (David)

  Discussion has started on the mailing list about the requirements
  and when we have those decided on the list, we should start working
  on document.

- draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns (David)

  This was accepted as charter item, but need few more reviews before
  taking it as WG draft. 

- draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv (Tero)

  This was also accepted as charter item, but would like to see few
  more reviews before taking it as WG draft.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi