Re: [IPsec] Additional charter items 1/4: Responder MOBIKE

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 21 February 2018 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC121242F7 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjB6G2i_UvyW for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F7212E89A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zmjts2Q8Kz37W; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1519231317; bh=25jmHHQ+AWsPGLvOOEtMdrcgffpyNICWQYBY6he4rbs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=MF5QNxSRO32Cx1eCC1vwepFxsxyK+kcxXDOOP6Szvc14Y9+MGekUQsXv4WnyjR32n yp7l8ExohQrndhvZeiUo63vDKd+S6zKe79KAfFJ46qV9E6Kx9RL7vLjqLtvTDXShpT f0S2Gd7aFaDFqqhwQh5kVeD2yJPLTf5zm3wkb7EA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i576GneO9K9a; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF665C75; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca AF665C75
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A1414535C; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
cc: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <23180.40426.204224.108279@fireball.acr.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1802211140160.31579@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <23175.7252.256625.885691@fireball.acr.fi> <02c501d3a95e$a5d73200$f1859600$@gmail.com> <23179.8656.330909.562547@fireball.acr.fi> <038e01d3aa5e$ec66bc80$c5343580$@gmail.com> <23180.40426.204224.108279@fireball.acr.fi>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/iINb8yxutwfwDEZ0ZN2l8NjIMiQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Additional charter items 1/4: Responder MOBIKE
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:42:08 -0000

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Tero Kivinen wrote:

>> In real life there is a NAT in most cases.
>
> Use IPv6 :-)
>
> Then there will not be problems with NATs...

Sadly, IPv6 NAT is happening and there is a request to add ESPinUDP
support for IPv6 in the Linux kernel :(

I think the topic is interesting and we should add it to the charter
in some way that does not tie this to MOBIKE. And we can discuss
from there.

Paul