IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Additional charter items 1/4: Responder MOBIKE

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 21 February 2018 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC121242F7 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjB6G2i_UvyW for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F7212E89A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zmjts2Q8Kz37W; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1519231317; bh=25jmHHQ+AWsPGLvOOEtMdrcgffpyNICWQYBY6he4rbs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=MF5QNxSRO32Cx1eCC1vwepFxsxyK+kcxXDOOP6Szvc14Y9+MGekUQsXv4WnyjR32n yp7l8ExohQrndhvZeiUo63vDKd+S6zKe79KAfFJ46qV9E6Kx9RL7vLjqLtvTDXShpT f0S2Gd7aFaDFqqhwQh5kVeD2yJPLTf5zm3wkb7EA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i576GneO9K9a; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:41:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF665C75; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca AF665C75
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A1414535C; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:41:55 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
cc: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <23180.40426.204224.108279@fireball.acr.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1802211140160.31579@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <23175.7252.256625.885691@fireball.acr.fi> <02c501d3a95e$a5d73200$f1859600$@gmail.com> <23179.8656.330909.562547@fireball.acr.fi> <038e01d3aa5e$ec66bc80$c5343580$@gmail.com> <23180.40426.204224.108279@fireball.acr.fi>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/iINb8yxutwfwDEZ0ZN2l8NjIMiQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Additional charter items 1/4: Responder MOBIKE
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:42:08 -0000

On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Tero Kivinen wrote:

>> In real life there is a NAT in most cases.
>
> Use IPv6 :-)
>
> Then there will not be problems with NATs...

Sadly, IPv6 NAT is happening and there is a request to add ESPinUDP
support for IPv6 in the Linux kernel :(

I think the topic is interesting and we should add it to the charter
in some way that does not tie this to MOBIKE. And we can discuss
from there.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email