IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey

"PUTMAN, Tony (Tony)" <tony.putman@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.putman@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512E921F963F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sr9v6vtL2p-C for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E57121F9638 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-66.lucent.com [135.5.2.66]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r3PHk2oo011181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:46:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r3PHk0RZ029763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:46:02 -0400
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.74) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:46:01 -0400
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.210]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:46:01 +0200
From: "PUTMAN, Tony (Tony)" <tony.putman@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
Thread-Index: AQHOPys8pnjJHNtKUkCIvg9Re01fopjm6+Bg
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:46:00 +0000
Message-ID: <14BE57EA00BC0C469E17B5AD698FE6770150FF@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <D05A8680-CFD7-4A3E-B679-62060D41946B@vpnc.org> <A1A0A2EC-3032-4945-B103-6022A71CFEEF@vpnc.org> <5174E6BD.7030200@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5174E6BD.7030200@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:46:08 -0000

I would like to express support for this draft.  I have reviewed the draft and have no comments on the contents.

I am a user of IPsec, not an implementer.  I feel that this will make support for raw keys more attractive to implementors so that it will become more widely available.  Raw public keys in conjunction with DANE is likely to be useful as a lighter-weight alternative to full PKI.

Regards,
Tony
--
Tony Putman
Alcatel-Lucent

-----Original Message-----
From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yaron Sheffer
Sent: 22 April 2013 08:29
To: Paul Hoffman; IPsecme WG
Subject: Re: [IPsec] STRONG NUDGE: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey

We have still not heard any additional responses for this last call. If
you think this draft is useful, please say so on the list. If you think
it needs to be fixed, please send your comments.

We are extending this LC until Friday of this week.

Thanks,
        Yaron

On 2013-04-17 18:18, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> We have gotten exactly one response to this, even though there were lots of people who said they thought this was a valuable addition to IKEv2. Please comment before Monday so we don't have to abandon the work.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>
>> Greetings again. This begins the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey, "More Raw Public Keys for IKEv2". You can find the current draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-oob-pubkey
>>
>> This document generated a fair amount of interest early, but we have not had much discussion since. Yaron and I would *really* like to have at least five WG members review the document and say on the list whether or not they think it is ready in its current state to move to IETF review. If you read it and feel it is not ready for any reason, please also say that in your message to the list.
>>
>> Again, participating in WG Last Calls is a great opportunity for those who are less active in the WG but who want to contribute to the IETF to make a difference.
>>
>> The WG Last Call should end in two weeks, on April 22. Please review the document before then. Thanks in advance!
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email