RE: Concerns

"Jeff D. Hayes" <hayesjd@mnbp2.network.com> Tue, 17 September 1996 05:05 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa03676; 17 Sep 96 1:05 EDT
Received: from neptune.hq.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10039; 17 Sep 96 1:04 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa27840; 17 Sep 96 0:46 EDT
Received: from relay.hq.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa27800; 17 Sep 96 0:41 EDT
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id AAA22453; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:45:22 -0400
Received: from sol.hq.tis.com(10.33.1.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022442; Tue, 17 Sep 96 00:44:53 -0400
Received: from relay.hq.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA14406; Tue, 17 Sep 96 00:44:07 EDT
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id AAA22439; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:44:52 -0400
Received: from nsco.network.com(129.191.1.1) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022437; Tue, 17 Sep 96 00:44:42 -0400
Received: from mnbp.network.com (ushub.network.com) by nsco.network.com (4.1/1.34) id AA20050; Mon, 16 Sep 96 23:54:18 CDT
Received: by mnbp.network.com with Microsoft Mail id <323E2C49@mnbp.network.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 96 23:42:49 CDT
From: "Jeff D. Hayes" <hayesjd@mnbp2.network.com>
To: ipsec <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: RE: Concerns
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 23:42:00 -0500
Message-Id: <323E2C49@mnbp.network.com>
Encoding: 17 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

[snip] let the marketplace decide which is better. If
the IETF does not get something out NOW, then the market will come up with
something of their own and all of your debating will be moot.

I will reiterate the statement I made several weeks ago: WE CAN NO LONGER
AFFORD TO DELAY THE GROWTH OF THIS INDUSTRY. People need solutions today,
and if they cannot get them through the IETF, they will get them elsewhere.

**Horray John Lawler!  The opportunity for all of us is too great to be 
mired in techno squabble.  The show must go on!  The question is who should 
lead it?  Why not co-leaders?

jeff.hayes@network.com