clarification

rohit <rohit@trinc.com> Thu, 12 March 1998 14:46 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id JAA29575 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 12 Mar 1998 09:46:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19980312170026.006c68a4@192.9.200.10>
X-Sender: rohit@192.9.200.10
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 17:00:26 +0500
To: ipsec@tis.com
From: rohit <rohit@trinc.com>
Subject: clarification
Cc: kent@bbn.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk


Hi All,
     

    I am sorry, i didn't get anything from the following table,which is in
new ipsec draft ( page 20 ),can sombody on the list will explain this,

******
  The following table summarizes the relationship between the
 "Next Header" value in the packet and SPD and the derived Port
 Selector value for the SPD and SAD.

  The following table summarizes the relationship between the
 "Next Header" value in the packet and SPD and the derived Port
 Selector value for the SPD and SAD.

		Next Hdr	Next Hdr	Derived Port Selector Field
		in Packet	in SPD		Value in SPD and SAD
		--------	--------	---------------------------
		ESP 		ESP or ANY	ANY (i.e., don't look at it)
		-don't care-	ANY		ANY (i.e., don't look at it)
	 specific value  specific value    NOT ANY (i.e.,drop packet)
	 fragment
	specific value	specific value	actual port selector
                                       					              field	not fragment
*****


							- Thanks 
								Rohit
 
*******************************************************************
    -: Bridging The Gap Between Software And Hardware :-

Rohit Aradhya                              Ph : (040)7742606   
Rendzevous Onchip Pvt Ltd.                 Em : rohit@trinc.com
First Floor, Plot No 14
New Vasavi Nagar, Karkhana
Secunderbad -500019.
India
*******************************************************************