[IPsec] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-eddsa-04

Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B52128B8D; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:09:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-eddsa.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.66.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151179175411.30910.13010385715015417131@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:09:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/kWOSbL-UzDERLf26EiatAecQHzk>
Subject: [IPsec] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-eddsa-04
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:09:14 -0000

Reviewer: Adam Montville
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

This document is ready.

A very straightforward, short document defining a new value in
SIGNATURE_HASH_ALGORITHMS notification of IKE, so that non-hashing signature
methods (specifically the Edwards-curve digital signature algorithm) can be
used.

One nit: s/or/of/ in last sentence of second introduction paragraph, so that it
reads, "See section 8.5 of RFC 8032...".