Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 21 November 2018 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB756130F7F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:36:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MfEyrcnKYa4z for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95E6130FD7 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 08:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAF720089; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 416ACBBD; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB3EBB7; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811211012160.24767@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <154275299932.29937.5149382512933072864.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811210006170.29140@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHw9_iKyBpOa1ktYvDDvuHnN+nLN7GnP49PwdT6-FWqNzDrUgg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811211012160.24767@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:18 -0500
Message-ID: <2900.1542818178@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/kiwKFwt-5G6OeuMNCUVgTBxL09U>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:36:27 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>; wrote:
    > These VPN services need to take ALL your network traffic. We now more
    > explicitly state INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN and INTERNAL_DNSSEC_TA MUST be
    > ignored when the VPN configuration is not a split tunnel one.

And, there is no reason for this kind of VPN service to have any
INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN, so it would be reasonable for a well configured client
to simply ignore such things.

(It's not like they have .internal or .corp for you...
Some of the services offer virtual corporation services, but that's really
a different kettle of fish)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-