Re: [IPsec] ICV sizes

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Sat, 08 March 2014 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EBE1A0159 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:24:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0kMTif_qbPPq for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF231A00FC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildlpprd01.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd01.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.33]) by mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s28ENvhe030857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:23:58 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com s28ENvhe030857
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1394288638; bh=r+b86CViDIpym5FXWUq30AsfkZA=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=vXHANhcoQyd+gBzrRdR8M5l6iwKPwD44+AEvyLENWbRpp3LJ/lDE6gtvyy5zhbmJA RyzGdJDAc75IC2ZFiMUKE8+UH6f/58W2Rc9CbcZL8yoJpU0iSgL9W+EEyFP6LHOqAv 5YHeNjzcLijQbNzPX4FwQwprtP9lKDJGjuwg4sbw=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd04.lss.emc.com s28ENvhe030857
Received: from mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.22]) by maildlpprd01.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:23:36 -0500
Received: from mxhub27.corp.emc.com (mxhub27.corp.emc.com [10.254.110.183]) by mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s28ENawf006858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:23:36 -0500
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.223]) by mxhub27.corp.emc.com ([10.254.110.183]) with mapi; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:23:36 -0500
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "'paul.hoffman@vpnc.org'" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:23:35 -0500
Thread-Topic: ICV sizes
Thread-Index: Ac862au5OKvJkV+xSWSesjh4SnCZ3gAAFHkx
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71206CF4F78B7@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <55D8171A-FF38-45A1-B299-4EB5189743A7@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: DLM_1, public
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/mYCOJfPafQmxRN0C0q2qnE_93Gg
Cc: "'ipsec@ietf.org'" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] ICV sizes
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 14:24:05 -0000

Ok, no problem here ...

Thanks, --David +++Sent from Blackberry

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 09:21 AM
To: Black, David
Cc: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: ICV sizes

On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

> I have no strong opinion on ICV size for GCM and GMAC, but I am interested
> in the outcome as an author of the Block Storage IPsec profile update
> (draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-04).  That draft does not currently
> express requirements on ICV length.  That draft's in Authors 48 hours at
> the moment as part of the entire iSCSI draft cluster, and it could be held
> to apply the ICV length outcome determined here if that were deemed important.

Making technical changes to a document in AUTH48 is a really bad idea. If you were not specific enough when writing the draft, you should probably just leave it alone.

--Paul Hoffman