Re: replay field size

Tim Bass (IETF) <ietf@linux.silkroad.com> Mon, 10 February 1997 16:41 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa24890; 10 Feb 97 11:41 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14212; 10 Feb 97 11:41 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id LAA10166 for ipsec-outgoing; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:31:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Tim Bass <ietf@linux.silkroad.com>
Message-Id: <199702101632.LAA00253@linux.silkroad.com>
Subject: Re: replay field size
To: ipsec@tis.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:32:50 -0500
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

>From the RFCs:

For IPv6, options (with padding) must be on 64 bit (8 byte boundaries).

For IPv4, multibyte options are not required to adhere to an alignment 
specification.

Tim