Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks

Hi Johannes,

note that this discussion is still a bit tentative, as we are working 
with Sean to add the "DH checks" draft into our charter. But anyway...

For formal reasons, I would like to avoid a dependency from "DH Checks" 
on Brainpool. So the better option is #2: have Brainpool I-Ds refer to 
our I-D in their IANA Considerations.

I would like to use this opportunity to wish everyone on this list Happy 
Holidays and a Happy New Year. Paul and I did consider creating a 
Christmas video for your enjoyment (like 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YR-d3JHYec&feature=youtu.be), luckily 
for everyone we decided to skip it this year :-)

	Yaron

On 12/20/2012 04:05 PM, Johannes Merkle wrote:
>>
>> I.e. make the document define the generic ideas in the body, make IANA
>> considerations section to add the note field to the IANA registry,
>> which specifies this RFC and subsection in it for each group.
>>
> Which way to prefer for the "new" EC groups, i.e. the Brainpool I-Ds from Dan and me?
> 1. Also include references to these I-D in the draft IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
> 2. Include a note in the IANA section of each Brainpool I-D to add for these curves a reference to the corresponding
> section of the DH-checks RFC?
>
> Johannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>