Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 3254221F84F1 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFNa2xcAdgzw for
 <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.215.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E47621F84FC for
 <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m13so3121341lah.35 for
 <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc
 :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=DFdn8SjVEN6fo2CWFVE94DkSSGPtu8CVNyzvbAYJeLM=;
 b=em/joXvh5OCrAYIFE5/7eIeEzmBmKPtUv2plN+3q6i2W+FGiwgqciTnS1wfh5kf9YA
 fEkvW38L5mrfhaXxTkutImaUy5mt6a7CZds2AuK16qUfrSyterIY6uo2XFsitPTbJo9h
 1lxjjx3cooy9/YyoFIBYD8kKpKAeWgnRb3ifA7ykNA1KVO0ZymH1WR0RRrDKaJdaAAMf
 ydxH/Zeu5yjX/rEPUb7RHgkZmrlhOJsKr8eFp5/HBR7rFhAQcbl/SUVRSCU4nkgcuBwx
 zqWWVU2dePS4KsM0cNolbrZooO4loS2A7XG8nh9xnXrcaAnf1cvF2DsbzixlCkfflPE/ JAFg==
X-Received: by 10.152.104.112 with SMTP id gd16mr9155479lab.26.1356014022055;
 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.13] (85-250-110-45.bb.netvision.net.il.
 [85.250.110.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
 b3sm3513961lbl.0.2012.12.20.06.33.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D321BE.1080407@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:33:34 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
References: <50C62D6A.8010709@gmail.com>
 <5808c090d8485cc6698829b522fade80.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
 <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E6940@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
 <50C9B0B5.9090600@secunet.com>
 <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421E71FE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
 <a5622369ac2e85b8b04cefea05c832b8.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
 <20691.6156.393731.420290@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
 <50D31B35.8090104@secunet.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D31B35.8090104@secunet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>,
 Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>,
 "Scott Fluhrer \(sfluhrer\)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>,
 <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,
 <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:33:50 -0000

Hi Johannes,

note that this discussion is still a bit tentative, as we are working 
with Sean to add the "DH checks" draft into our charter. But anyway...

For formal reasons, I would like to avoid a dependency from "DH Checks" 
on Brainpool. So the better option is #2: have Brainpool I-Ds refer to 
our I-D in their IANA Considerations.


I would like to use this opportunity to wish everyone on this list Happy 
Holidays and a Happy New Year. Paul and I did consider creating a 
Christmas video for your enjoyment (like 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YR-d3JHYec&feature=youtu.be), luckily 
for everyone we decided to skip it this year :-)

	Yaron

On 12/20/2012 04:05 PM, Johannes Merkle wrote:
>>
>> I.e. make the document define the generic ideas in the body, make IANA
>> considerations section to add the note field to the IANA registry,
>> which specifies this RFC and subsection in it for each group.
>>
> Which way to prefer for the "new" EC groups, i.e. the Brainpool I-Ds from Dan and me?
> 1. Also include references to these I-D in the draft IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
> 2. Include a note in the IANA section of each Brainpool I-D to add for these curves a reference to the corresponding
> section of the DH-checks RFC?
>
> Johannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
