IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2

"Guggemos, Tobias" <guggemos@nm.ifi.lmu.de> Tue, 05 November 2019 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <guggemos@nm.ifi.lmu.de>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCA51208F4 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 04:03:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKCHRdN7Vjn8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 04:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de (postout1.mail.lrz.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:103::81bb:ff89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C278C1208F3 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 04:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476pGN4T92zyYk; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de
Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs51.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id rEzXk3xnd2Cq; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX06.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWMBX06.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "BADWLRZ-SWMBX06", Issuer "BADWLRZ-SWMBX06" (not verified)) by postout1.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476pGK5m3GzyYS; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX05.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::161) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX06.ads.mwn.de (2001:4ca0:0:108::162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:21 +0100
Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX05.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::4095:4fb3:50be:d2bd]) by BADWLRZ-SWMBX05.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::4095:4fb3:50be:d2bd%12]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.009; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:21 +0100
From: "Guggemos, Tobias" <guggemos@nm.ifi.lmu.de>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2
Thread-Index: AQHVkpf4LbesLWJPLEWHHEzSwUaKnKd8ajfw
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:03:21 +0000
Message-ID: <bbc06ef4428b4e57b66e991fee0d8c20@nm.ifi.lmu.de>
References: <23999.22463.132733.702468@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <23999.22463.132733.702468@fireball.acr.fi>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 04
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: BADWLRZ-SWMBX05.ads.mwn.de
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [141.84.218.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/p84PF07DDc7Rz7C_9Dxurw6z_6o>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:03:29 -0000

Hey,
I also strongly support adoption.

>   It is an open question whether or not it is feasible to build a
>   Quantum Computer (and if so, when one might be implemented), but if
>
> Feasibility of some quantum computer is becoming much less of an open 
> question; perhaps we want some qualifiers about efficiency, scale, 
> and/or general-purpose-nature.
> Do we have a reference for this "it is believed", or is it just the 
> outcome of the WG discussions?

Regarding this discussion (and sorry if this was discussed before and I didn't realize).
Do we really need the term post-quantum in the title (and maybe even in the abstract)?
The draft tells how to do multiple/hybrid key-exchanges in IKEv2, PQ is the major motivation but not the only use case.
As far as I'm familiar with the draft, you could easily do DH + ECDH with it (and if not I'd really like it be like that).

Regards
Tobias

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: IPsec <ipsec-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Tero Kivinen
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. November 2019 23:42
> An: ipsec@ietf.org
> Betreff: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2
> 
> This is adoption call for the draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2
> draft to be accepted to be WG Document. This draft has been around for
> some time, and we have been discussing it in the meetings.
> 
> If you support adopting this document as WG Document, then send email
> indicating your support to the ipsec@ietf.org mailing-list. If you have any
> comments or reservations send them to the list too.
> 
> This adoption call finishes 2019-11-11.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email