Re: Replay field size in AH
Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org> Mon, 10 February 1997 02:11 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa02473; 9 Feb 97 21:11 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01820; 9 Feb 97 21:11 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id SAA04401 for ipsec-outgoing; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 18:24:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 23:23:24 +0000
From: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Subject: Re: Replay field size in AH
To: ipsec@tis.com
Cc: rja@inet.org, Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
X-Mailer: Chameleon ATX 6.0, Standards Based IntraNet Solutions, NetManage Inc.
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <3.0.16.19970209105421.3847cd10@pop3.pn.com>
Message-ID: <Chameleon.855530725.rja@c8-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Rodney, My understanding has never been that AH would go away. AH and the proposed "ESP without encryption" do not have identical semantics. My understanding has always been that existing conforming implementations of AH/ESP would not be made non-conforming by any of the changes that Steve Kent is proposing. Ran rja@Inet.org
- Replay field size in AH Naganand Doraswamy
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent
- RE: Replay field size in AH Rob Adams
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Rodney Thayer
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent