IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Some comments / questions on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE521F8C86 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:54:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgTrA70QUz1q for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DD021F8C6F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z4so1115372qan.10 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:54:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/639Js0Jwr05EVMTjIHUcdBl1PyDcLfEGunQX5A3xtg=; b=sq1uKGO3wBIwEVttVnnIPpDzcMvLDaXz7JCR+VDRG7Z5A6shmgiy5qeqCZ6TMa8M3D dd4MjqDJyDfm7QuAAX6GE0g007Q5Had/uItPogC/n1xstL1GNtyrTvq62AkKRKPrT6BB 1/qDtY+TErxgW576XoUDrc3dNWqtIj00jO9vapwo8I+VbX24zrBcrKNbz+1NIELIhwQg 0qkjv0zs2R4GPp4f9icQrIEdbBOO7Ib6b8vvvjRjzOT5Q74gMhZYYTca9ERAJUpgbh9C Lj3MZ13ff3XXvpjS77dEdp5lYMVOgL33rexCJN96AKcy64U2CqodvHyKXWR+WJYRx7Jv +2wg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.48.110 with SMTP id k14mr26297787qen.28.1354643652758; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:54:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.92.77 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:54:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50BE30D9.4030903@labn.net>
References: <50A5703F.4070305@labn.net> <CAOyVPHTWhv8=sP6kYkZmOEsjMsdr72P8fe=7w5XY0Hd_wP_9=w@mail.gmail.com> <50A58CDB.30402@labn.net> <CAOyVPHQ+n83DaVv6Q9Z0kvi0MyYrhPbB=L6ju4fwjTyRK1P22Q@mail.gmail.com> <50A682F8.9080907@labn.net> <CAOyVPHSvWhgaYm2s_8_37VuaR1e_5tiJai+04AKzm3HXkNwESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A689A9.1090803@labn.net> <CAOyVPHR1euA9TRnAp7V+OKjRkPARYYvQ+C0HnA70y-122sy9ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A68D30.2040203@labn.net> <CAOyVPHR4OVNuvMU-UxZAJUoKFugCWwUQq0dSRo-7gY=Y886LoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOyVPHRopwvE5U3ZF7kDxNe59OgTk7ydoFG6iqvZdOFUCvaGyA@mail.gmail.com> <50BE30D9.4030903@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:54:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHSXQQt_31Y2MP+iMe8d0MCxSyKzVvCLL-HLkcggaOKuMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6d99d2b84d6904d00a8d24"
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Some comments / questions on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:54:24 -0000

Hi Lou,

Yes that's the intent. Please let me know what is it that we agreed to,
that is not there in the draft.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>         Was it your intent to  fully incorporated the changes we discussed
> into
> the -01 rev?   If so, I think some were missed (and I can send which in
> a separate message.)
>
> Thanks,
> Lou
>

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status