Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09.txt> (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 13 December 2019 20:28 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634B412008B; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:28:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nka9dvBsDP4y; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40D7120888; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ZMgV6410zF6f; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:28:22 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1576268902; bh=Gberw/jHi1EjdfaDCqBN6cSyqwBvtXWVygUhZvMLfzM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=D8KI0EjwdaqWl9YAHISCmA06TQOJCrYAFOXfhcsbHzbfzNC0TFX5gYpyBEm+SlfUr bLuw+QnYhjxW4FwavBDyQ/Z7bwX0OSeIBdZ+ckHKRX8yG7uCunavt5u4HNi6DBycjR hfsd2yP0ahpELA46GSPq+GUbIDYeFF68/L604Upo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lryujhk-9fbE; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:28:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:28:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C51106007ADD; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:28:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C457066AA8; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:28:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:28:20 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Kenny Paterson <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1BB9D55C-7880-4ABF-AD82-F0C1F8FC04A5@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1912131527360.20139@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <157607548927.11531.316316195814237240.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A4AC9EAC-7BAB-489D-81BA-9BF11BFED59F@akamai.com> <ABD7EC9F-7412-4AFB-B9A4-AEB974CCDEFD@vpnc.org> <1BB9D55C-7880-4ABF-AD82-F0C1F8FC04A5@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/qFGBlWCUhCzhGI1I0uHUHlzYOtc>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09.txt> (Postquantum Preshared Keys for IKEv2) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:28:48 -0000
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Salz, Rich wrote: >> A much better title would be > "Mixing Preshared Keys in IKEv2 for Postquantum Resistance". > > That's better. > > I misunderstood the document as both you and David Mcgrew kindly explained. I withdraw my concerns and hope the title is changed. I am fine with the title change (and publication). We have long ago implemented this and performed a number of interop tests. Paul
- Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ip… Yoav Nir
- [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-0… The IESG
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Salz, Rich
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Salz, Rich
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ip… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ip… Salz, Rich
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ike… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ip… Paul Wouters