[IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?

"Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com> Tue, 06 November 2012 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <liushucheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331E411E80DE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:41:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xluT9-6R0BjZ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40D811E80D5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ALG22696; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:41:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:40:21 +0000
Received: from SZXEML418-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.157) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 02:40:26 +0000
Received: from SZXEML546-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.157]) by szxeml418-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:40:23 +0800
From: "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?
Thread-Index: Ac27st34YuL+AJ3vS+uF/hXmYQ5XFg==
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:40:22 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 01:00:00 +0000
Message-ID: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B9A4F60@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.136.105]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B9A4F60szxeml546mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [IPsec] Will it be a good idea if we join in meetecho?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:41:06 -0000

Hi all,

I see that several WGs are in here. http://ietf85.conf.meetecho.com/
Do you think it would be a good idea that we also join this?

Will