Re: [IPsec] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: (with DISCUSS)

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Sat, 29 April 2017 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F483129B5E for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzmxOFg-6QdD for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14EFA129B69 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1493424583; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pwviLUhRM9fnRmnGAGC7KnMEwRN6/Jf73o3mf5i6YRc=; b=M6O1Gy71qK5EU+YXXUU+bS0e6Li5s7nL9R9VclSiGFgbgLImflED/MEIWYiF058r cti5UMjJFBk9ckWjYHiCFZMKpOtq2S21ir2UlZJtoCv1LArRVYgaitbgC9a5Vxpg zksWCTiYUY7r3ps2nW9rtpXb/2dMj95DD/GgcRLhKvaVNaWihB9pzLo9MiOlfUKM hhKhNABTgd94Tp3vVSbi9SkKt+oqoBNf7pz+xyrCjW5/fbWAlovw3mxVdhGD3AMh cWGxxVw5bBpYKOcWFPUl0bohr+my5mr2yy6bHXQa3an+Fwe5FVFgBDs7aJutJ3MN lzjqJNv/E4/Bws4x/JTLiw==;
Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com [17.128.113.87]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 0B.90.25795.7C9D3095; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-4cd389a0000064c3-43-5903d9c7a347
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com [17.128.115.155]) by relay4.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 81.C5.02523.7C9D3095; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_UX9XpZOoFTk06fHC9i9IIA)"
Received: from [17.153.75.111] by nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170210 64bit (built Feb 10 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0OP500CCG9S6EV20@nwk-mmpp-sz11.apple.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <853700CB-D5DD-4BC7-A1F5-5AB61330E70D@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:09:42 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAKKJt-fb1vx=SzpJ_9gvtJ+SEH08nyBRGqb7F36PGw0EyJ6zmA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps@ietf.org
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <149312449263.5884.11168631631187069210.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1CD2BB99-CDA2-472A-9833-741FB14CAE4A@apple.com> <752dde8c-0592-288e-6920-53a211834740@kuehlewind.net> <CABcZeBMj9UpzD+CpvOMKOkUsYNSL-UQCwuYt__5XCXtH=zyesA@mail.gmail.com> <22fac532-f30b-03e3-0757-aed213e5a346@kuehlewind.net> <22785.64570.259658.376130@fireball.acr.fi> <277aa94d-5aa1-7a28-94c7-81da0966c172@kuehlewind.net> <41594727-9667-42BD-ABB1-4583A3B00EA2@apple.com> <CAKKJt-fb1vx=SzpJ_9gvtJ+SEH08nyBRGqb7F36PGw0EyJ6zmA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3263)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpgkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRbCgM1z1+kznSYPE6Q4v3f84wWqx4fY7d YsaficwWL65/ZLbYv+UFm8XMOR9YLI6ef85msWzKHmYHDo+ds+6yeyxZ8pPJ4/DXhSweLR8X snpMftzGHMAaxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWxr3MSW8EMpYrb29pYGhi/yXYxcnJICJhIPFzVztrF yMUhJLCaSeLw303sMImpW88wQyQOMUqsW7GMGSTBKyAo8WPyPRYQm1kgTGLLumcsEEVfGSU+ 9vwCcjg4hAUkJDbvSQSpYRNQkTj+bQNUr43E/AtNbCC2sECqxOv7u8BsFgFVif47s4Fq2Dk4 BYIlZluBTGQWuMYoce7wN7B7RARiJG5/OcAGsWo6i8T9NasZIQ6VleheOA3sUAmBbnaJ84+W sE5gFJqF5NZZSG6FsLUkvj9qBbI5gGx5iYPnZSHCmhLP7n1ih7C1JZ68u8C6gJFtFaNQbmJm jm5mnqleYkFBTqpecn7uJkZQlE23E97BeHqV1SFGAQ5GJR7eDg/mSCHWxLLiytxDjNIcLEri vJ5xQCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2MzUKTJh7VYGLvizj803lzx423V2++9OU7 d3vHJYV9fgYrHq1K6XQPaHvke+ekVG+lRHJO7tnDRbzreEvWV9hv62n3ubVqjlGP7Op/szX+ MG1z/5sUffT65XvLiyVlvN6FtKz8+t7KTjt7tQZ3h4kob8VmSY+f1c+D75RKsi2ZImGudE78 0Vw7JZbijERDLeai4kQA2L58UJMCAAA=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FA8W/f4TeZIg8+XlCze/znDaLHi9Tl2 ixl/JjJbvLj+kdli/5YXbBYz53xgsTh6/jmbxbIpe5gdODx2zrrL7rFkyU8mj8NfF7J4tHxc yOox+XEbcwBrFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGvs5JbAUzlCpub2tjaWD8JtvFyMkhIWAiMXXrGeYu Ri4OIYFDjBLrVixjBknwCghK/Jh8jwXEZhYIk9iy7hkLRNFXRomPPb+AHA4OYQEJic17EkFq 2ARUJI5/2wDVayMx/0ITG4gtLJAq8fr+LjCbRUBVov/ObKAadg5OgWCJ2VYgE5kFrjFKnDv8 jR2kREQgRuL2lwNsEKums0jcX7OaEeJQWYnuhdOYJzDyz0Jy3iwk50HYWhLfH7UC2RxAtrzE wfOyEGFNiWf3PrFD2NoST95dYF3AyLaKUaAoNSex0kQvsaAgJ1UvOT93EyM4KgrDdzD+W2Z1 iFGAg1GJh7fDgzlSiDWxrLgyFxhGHMxKIrw2W4BCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGCcyAj05kVlK NDkfGLN5JfGGJiYGJsbGZsbG5ibmtBRWEuedls0UKSSQnliSmp2aWpBaBHMUEwenVAPjmqVr fvuJHfnCePSChHiy+aI/71Yza9euTrl4OYBRSyBugpx/6ofohFAP/YpJG+SfOT8wb7nNY+MT P/tAP8N2lXOsb3vY1gp/vWIVsN4qZ+4k5W8vDS5t4xY+tVFQyPsMh8vD5a/LG1q3N8tnbrew NN55cJbV+Zn/lh1I/XVW0l12r9S2pM9blFiKMxINtZiLihMBWjlEm/0CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/rYoBg5PtN8OJR7IJGAPjHv8rM4A>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:12:47 -0000

I'll defer to Tero on this one. Tero, what do you prefer to do with the IANA Considerations text?

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Apr 28, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This is still Mirja's Discuss (which I supported), so I'll let her respond to most of Tommy's proposed text changes, but on the last one ...
> 
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com <mailto:tpauly@apple.com>> wrote:
> 
> 14.  IANA Considerations
> 
>    This memo includes no request to IANA.
> 
>    TCP port 4500 is already allocated to IPsec for NAT Traversal.  This port SHOULD
>    be used for TCP encapsulated IKE and ESP as described in this document.
> 
> With no IANA actions, the entry in https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=4500 <https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=4500> for 4500/tcp will still point to http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3947 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3947> as the reference. 
> 
> Should that change when this draft is published?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer, who may be confused, but wanted to ask before the draft is approved