IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment (was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-00.txt)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 01 April 2015 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C317B1A9105 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjdDDBa38-h2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227291A9121 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lH7vL3zcbz5c; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:40:30 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=XY5CuYz3
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IMDPUczRjKQV; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:40:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:40:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E58803E0; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:40:28 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1427895628; bh=HRrF1Tr9vdDC4ZSu7wt7SqL5Dbll0sMPgsvJZem7Ozo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XY5CuYz3RgoLUPzW3O0GNS8eHNys0AccoBlpczoaonDEAntW1YGRPLqHGSQk9ots5 IgEJzoK/9uWNFzS/s3Vq9sS98NSSwdJygSe+1PcRagiD+nVLfQErLIOMf4rrfa6LKe Iu7v5NTVwEJLXY6BR8L3I0bO+Zt7L87alpzae7Yg=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id t31DeSA0020150; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:40:28 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:40:28 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7574C5A-B634-42EA-8E26-D3B7BBA4613D@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1504010939210.10041@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20150330133237.21486.80504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D7430231-BDAB-4766-8637-D4609634F3D3@gmail.com> <E7574C5A-B634-42EA-8E26-D3B7BBA4613D@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/rtY23NDIzcrW6gmZNlcOiFZ2jqU>
Cc: IETF IPsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment (was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:40:42 -0000

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Yoav Nir wrote:

> OK, so this thread kind of got side-tracked about the name of the algorithm.  I think ENCR_CHACHA20_POLY1305 works for everybody.
> What about early code point assignment?

Just to confirm, yes please. As I said before, let's not have another
twofish/serpent private use number in common use.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email