IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions

Hilarie Orman <ho@earth.hpc.org> Thu, 31 October 1996 16:25 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa02031; 31 Oct 96 11:25 EST
Received: from neptune.hq.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13976; 31 Oct 96 11:25 EST
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa16443; 31 Oct 96 10:50 EST
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 09:46:34 -0500
From: Hilarie Orman <ho@earth.hpc.org>
Message-Id: <199610311446.JAA02150@earth.hpc.org>
To: ipsec@tis.com
MMDF-Warning: Unable to confirm address in preceding line at neptune.TIS.COM
Subject: Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

> > Certainly support for *sending* packets with arbitrarily-nested headers
> > is harder to implement.
 
> Yep!  

I don't see why.  Define the SA's, make a list of them, perform some
form of "open" operation with the list.  Send.  Interpret list, one SA at
a time.

Hilarie

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status