RE: replay field size

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 13 February 1997 03:59 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id WAA01851 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 22:59:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender: kent@po1.bbn.com
Message-Id: <v03007802af27ed566718@[128.33.229.246]>
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.855637101.rja@c8-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com>
References: <01BC1774.B4080180@Tastid.Cisco.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 23:01:10 -0500
To: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: RE: replay field size
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Whoops!

I didn't read all the way to the end of Ran's message from Tuesday, so when
I responded to David Kemp's straw poll message, I didn't realize that I was
proposing to make editorial decisions prior to the deadline for the straw
poll (and without the benefit of the private responses to the poll).
Please ignore the deadline from my message.  I'll await the outcome of the
straw poll, as reported by Ran and Paul, before making the necessary edits
to AH and ESP.

Steve