IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 May 2020 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560943A0CC1; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNABALB2V8OX; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2053A0CC6; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id a4so2229080lfh.12; Sun, 03 May 2020 23:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=DuCOoseqObS1NydzROhjVIIe5TJBKws9kvWB/eQQ7/8=; b=uradxrLryUpuIM1Q/H8Q/x4XJKbbBZTDJSxgZvSi7nQCVIM6XKT20CXfTm9NpDBwiE yEw3w2B5Sz9zeiiIuR3hBhFLHqP4pu+F4aD7JdoKGep4ab+wwE7AdfhPawxggNJcdFjR /8nYrrkQa1ZM06o/tCQVWCV1A+5H0kCEP6Qf15+sfmmKeU6siYlgEowOxGSDglJ2qdFS N7Vdr4qklDcGj5eCnF2AfFPNeCkyfH6lTyr8mQMYlhu8EW/YYvzq/E+6ghhmMvERM53L s6NyYcgLy/HQ+KaZuqalh8q0Q1/6XhrEtvMVlCuN9hJ05aP+I82cOnLh0Xz886u/iSdf haYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=DuCOoseqObS1NydzROhjVIIe5TJBKws9kvWB/eQQ7/8=; b=fUtx/7oAyHbZYDbc1WcIqKWLqZOUURA4rXIjVbfqYT05rHNBjWhq6P0NNhB3acRc3C 2EEp/OsdvWwzs76mVPzxj7MTWu9f7ctJRic8mBc3q8RpzPNxsRQ6um5j0btpsnsNAGfi Eq4augnBe4p9Fm8Cyq2qAo77wWN2783il0gT04ECTrsQ9Egi2O87hfkB60XFbUY1XBQJ cKzNlkjMroNlHHqyeCbo2sT7EKXqAiHBJlIL4snlX9W/fHjfrm2rm/i4r2AbpvBFx4ZO 3B2Cl6nvTCsYfHvEowWB8a5gcXMRYmod5Y93oVanMdbJk9hZNVdqrzlIvIwulGWXQkTf 9PAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYOcXrU10gyS8yVI62YAEbh7dWeoLn3vnMFtDRvkenmyUxOHMaW bItJKNetCQKtXPftFti5Vta5zFKl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLOVYuVCmM0+wnKOqpbtvSl1a4ZEznu64/PjcelGHbE2ok/avKrMDjmjuF9MNes9BoyYsTc4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10cd:: with SMTP id k13mr10574852lfg.173.1588572429735; Sun, 03 May 2020 23:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chichi (95-27-147-103.broadband.corbina.ru. [95.27.147.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19sm8664242lfl.53.2020.05.03.23.07.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 May 2020 23:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Benjamin Kaduk' <kaduk@mit.edu>, 'Yoav Nir' <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, 'Tommy Pauly' <tpauly@apple.com>
References: <0b5201d61d43$0f16dfe0$2d449fa0$@gmail.com> <53F12987-8F6B-46B7-831C-A4185E2B3805@apple.com> <007d01d61e3c$c43a8990$4caf9cb0$@gmail.com> <69538081-E679-4BE4-A818-6AD424ECBCF0@gmail.com> <20200503224914.GG27494@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20200503224914.GG27494@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 09:07:08 +0300
Message-ID: <004a01d621da$3ebab960$bc302c20$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: ru
Thread-Index: AQJ4LbZ9m5c/82foCko2jbr+bIGR0wF6ZQFdAY3dosQB4F+1GwJreDRJpxi2PWA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/vqtLcFTuLZo3VRASEsLQgM4S8DM>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 06:07:13 -0000

Hi Ben,

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:54:26PM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
> > [With chair hat on]
> >
> > Yes, the charter says that we are to make a guidance document. If the
> working group feels that it’s better to put the specification and guidance in a
> single document, we can work on that and clear it with the ADs.
> >
> > Charters can be modified.
> 
> FWIW I don't see a particular need to recharter to do an 8229bis.

Can you please clarify for those of us who (like me) are not native speakers:
do you think that the current charter allows to do an 8229bis without need to recharter
or do you think there is no need to do an 8229bis and thus no need to recharter?

Thank you,
Valery.

> -Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email