[IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 08 April 2013 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B04121F92B2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1dWsW7-DvFwv for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C1421F928B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net []) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r38Lk1JY014577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:46:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F821C79-A855-4060-A356-ED8E5C50048B@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:46:00 -0700
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [IPsec] NUDGE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:46:02 -0000

[[ So far, we have received only *one* review of this document, from Tero. If we don't receive more reviews, the document might not progress due to lack of interest. Please review this document within the next week and contribute your review to the list. ]]

Greetings. This is the start of the WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks; the WG period will end in two weeks, on April 15. The current draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-01

Given that this will be a Standards Track document, it is important for it to be reviewed by as many people as possible. Possible results of individual reviewing the document are:

- "Looks fine, please publish"

- "Looks fine, here are some comments"

- "Has some problems, here they are"

- Other things of that sort

Many people on this mailing list are IPsec implementers but are mostly or completely silent on the mailing list. If you are one of those people, doing a WG Last Call review is a good way to participate usefully in the WG. Please strongly consider (a) reading the current draft and (b) sending a message to the list with your short or long review. If there are too few reviews on this document, we could get pushback from the IESG about the document.

--Paul Hoffman
IPsec mailing list