Re: IKE and Legacy A.S

Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com> Mon, 06 May 2002 18:04 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g46I4qL23814; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06435 Mon, 6 May 2002 13:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:31:12 -0700
From: Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@intotoinc.com>
To: Laurent Fabre <fabre@matranet.com>
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: IKE and Legacy A.S
In-Reply-To: <200205061628.SAA19666@malraux.matranet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205061029240.4788-100000@intotoinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

ISAKMP configuration method and XAUTH drafts are implemented
by good number of vendors to provide remote access and legacy
authentication. You can find these standards in www.vpnc.org.

Srini


On Mon, 6 May 2002, Laurent Fabre wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently studying the support of legacy authentication system
> for our products. During my researches i came accross the following drafts :
> 
> 	- draft-zegman-ike-hybrid-auth
> 	- draft-beaulieu-ike-xauth
> 	- draft-ietf-ipsra-pic
> 
> Hopefully these are the only proposals for legacy AS support,
> only the third seems to be revelant as the two others are out-of-date,
> if not please correct me.
> 
> Did anyone try to use PIC/EAP in his IKE implementation and would
> give feedback ?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 

-- 
Srinivasa Rao Addepalli
Intoto Inc.
3160, De La Cruz Blvd #100
Santa Clara, CA
USA
Ph: 408-844-0480 x317