Re: [IPsec] Rename IKE_AUX?

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 13 November 2018 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC7D130DD3 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:19:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KMfzlK2kFv6 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B012A130DCF for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42vGCY28M0zF6Y; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:19:53 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1542086393; bh=7c2ahmgF95zMA4CdAiW2Qi6010k1wJD9eptJh+//VQY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=s4vd0Y2leoccJlw2nJkeKDSIR3p+RzWsb7I0LKRotn42tODxf3bCv60R+nFjKw7v+ /sGrm+n3ZkhfYNUqZgCGQyqcb+XZauC6EYIWaMZ3JkbxSt5xFzPZqkGe0WxmDUn0tf 6skiSkwCPvkj1IdKfy794xwNYIm95zWSYoeY55Xc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wdPEZ3NtKeL2; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:19:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:19:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4535319409; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:19:50 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca B4535319409
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A770741C3B22; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:19:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:19:50 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "Hu, Jun (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jun.hu@nokia.com>
cc: CJ Tjhai <cjt@post-quantum.com>, "tpauly@apple.com" <tpauly@apple.com>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <PR1PR07MB57555409F7321D1B18B4F45895C20@PR1PR07MB5755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811130005550.9026@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <003b01d47a91$06b04950$1410dbf0$@gmail.com> <BC27A036-01C7-4381-9663-B7DDCCA55470@apple.com> <CANs=h-WM+z8NwD+YV_kzmC7WgLryZPxfjSh=fJ9ASvCD-B3DwQ@mail.gmail.com> <PR1PR07MB57555409F7321D1B18B4F45895C20@PR1PR07MB5755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/wUzwinIgyFW5hXAmQ7kxE66MRpU>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Rename IKE_AUX?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:19:57 -0000

Some other bike shed colours

IKE_INIT_C - Init Continued
IKE_INIT2
IKE_BE - Blob Exchange, Bulk Exchange
IKE_LARGE
IKE_BULK
IKE_BIG_KE
IKE_LARGE_KE

I think IKE_SA_INIT is misnamed and should have been IKE_INIT,
or IKE_AUTH should have been IKE_SA_AUTH :)

I don't like IKE_CONT[INUE] because it might imply something after
IKE is done. Similarly for IKE_SUPP is is midleading that it might
be something in supplement of IKE. The same is true for IKE_AUX.

But I don't care that much, just pick one. I don't object strongly to
any name mentioned so far. I rather see people reading the whole
draft carefully :)

Paul