Re: Replay field size in AH
Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com> Sun, 09 February 1997 16:05 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id LAA02596 for ipsec-outgoing; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:05:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.16.19970209105421.3847cd10@pop3.pn.com>
X-Pgp-Key: <http://www.shore.net/~sable/info/rltkey.htm>
X-Sender: rodney@pop3.pn.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (16)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 11:07:14 -0500
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Subject: Re: Replay field size in AH
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
And what is the state of the Grand Unified ESP spec? (Is there ANY AH spec anymore? I thought there wasn't.) At 02:13 PM 2/8/97 -0500, you wrote: >I'd like to hear from Jeff Schiller and the WG chairs re this still open >issue. My recollection is that there was supposed to be a small meetng to >reolve this after the last IPSEC WG meeting in San Jose. I observed that >we had two variables affecting aligmment: sequence number size and HMAC >size. Hugo made a suggestion to truncate the SHA-1 value to 128 bits, to >reduce the number of variables affecting alignment, but I don't recall a >decision on this, nor on the 32 vs. 64 bit sequence number. We do eed to >nail this down so that the grand unified AH and ESP specs can proceed. > >Steve > > > > Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com> +1 617 332 7292 Sable Technology Corp, 246 Walnut St., Newton MA 02160 USA Fax: +1 617 332 7970 http://www.shore.net/~sable "Developers of communications software"
- Replay field size in AH Naganand Doraswamy
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent
- RE: Replay field size in AH Rob Adams
- Re: Replay field size in AH Ran Atkinson
- Re: Replay field size in AH Rodney Thayer
- Re: Replay field size in AH Stephen Kent