IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IKE fragmentation

"Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E2D11E81A0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E85-rnrgs4iK for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (mail2.ihtfp.org [IPv6:2001:4830:143:1::3a11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D603C11E81A5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55F42602B6; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02674-05; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3151A260306; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 130.129.84.138 (SquirrelMail authenticated user warlord) by mail2.ihtfp.org with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:29 -0400
Message-ID: <f07e2fd06fa40902f88a2a414e678e07.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20799.34490.611737.922474@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
References: <20799.34490.611737.922474@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:26:29 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-2.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:04:26 -0700
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IKE fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:26:40 -0000

Mocana's implementation appears to only support fragmentation for IKEv1,
not IKEv2.

-derek

On Tue, March 12, 2013 3:49 pm, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Actually I verified the fragmentation support from Finland, and they
> said it was requested, but it is not in any product yet, and as Paul
> Wouters already commented to list that the problem with some
> implementations sending fragmentation regardless whether it was
> negotiated or not has already been fixed, I requirement to implement
> this quickly has gone...
>
> Anyways, if there is already more implementations doing IKE
> framentation, it might be good idea to think whether we should
> standardize that. On the other hand I am not sure if they are well
> enough documented so that different implementations actually talk each
> other...
>
> Anyways we should most likely act fastly if we want to get this fixed
> for IKEv2.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>


-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email