IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Fri, 17 May 2013 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A821F8551 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yf+wK9UaX1Pn for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9203C21F843E for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4H88YY6030627; Fri, 17 May 2013 11:08:34 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {5195E377-0-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Fri, 17 May 2013 11:08:33 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
Thread-Index: AQHOUlZ7rCucu8Gu7Ua/fs0xyuHbH5kISoqAgACJ9YA=
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:08:33 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E07507-29BE-4E69-A5A9-04D53C12666F@checkpoint.com>
References: <D49F3A1B-0BB0-4C48-84FB-00D8D86F0B3C@vpnc.org> <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com> <E4D705FB-5DD4-4256-B106-69C13A2715AB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4D705FB-5DD4-4256-B106-69C13A2715AB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.103]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 11dedda4303b2aeda4a7789c41b5053428ec1fb0c3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <CA5EA10C6BA73A409A8609AA31C090DB@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:08:44 -0000

On May 17, 2013, at 2:54 AM, Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> Yaron: do we want to stay with the current TCP-based solution?
>> 	Brian: might be running on sensors that don't have a TCP stack
> 
> Someone made this comment, but it wasn't me. 

That was Daniel.

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email