Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #114: Expired drafts, especially BEET

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 27 October 2009 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26DE28C106 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.367, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytRl-VgJugdo for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4E928C170 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (sn87.proper.com [75.101.18.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n9RKJbHa011527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624084fc70d05bc8c15@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930789878B75@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
References: <063.783474ea3d34b716e39da24271b27cac@tools.ietf.org> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930789878B75@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:35 -0700
To: "Frankel, Sheila E." <sheila.frankel@nist.gov>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [ipsecme] #114: Expired drafts, especially BEET
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:19:37 -0000

At 11:46 AM -0400 10/27/09, Frankel, Sheila E. wrote:
>Two Internet Drafts were written to address these problems: Extended Authentication withn IKE (XAUTH) (draft-beaulieu-ike-xauth) and The ISAKMP Configuration Method (draft-dukes-ike-mode-cfg). 

I would prefer:

Many Internet Drafts were written to address these problems in different ways. Two that were adopted by many vendors were Extended Authentication withn IKE (XAUTH) (draft-beaulieu-ike-xauth) and The ISAKMP Configuration Method (draft-dukes-ike-mode-cfg).


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium