Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-06 - key length is missing

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Sat, 06 April 2019 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11B120232 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gxz7mRocTtNn for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DEA1200EF for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id j89so7707739ljb.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E8kth12W2aGSQ+PMXX9DG1deKVfpVI1IMqOUFF96P+s=; b=NH6E7v/LpMmXEZtxObUriBEZUEyceFuAVBeMdUCjz9X3bLYT1ycEd5HMpaZq0CY38s 0pI+f0QfahyNd9mKtRpa/Td0I+nntRYfY51xRrWjuOcDzjM8+m4sAw2DCZHj4/8DR+L7 k3M0vqBkkdPcmnVSZ45H+kkxr9gFdGbzIFd523440SZZTDqncZjNM5vNMMfidgAQZDYu sn9XNpdyr00T82RLvISdLFLRviSe6IiJkySDiZCQmA4UZU+3KlcYdAZ9pLr3J14k9YsC MGsP12uCScj1F6Cbi73X+ncUcSAQdUOrcE6mb3xGbKqBTDFbaoXbsLkE033ermjgdg0Y Dn5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+1K9PTqa8uOrkFXa4/w9jIpk9UT0mrX1Bwco7eu2gTIbSLS0y KghM3rkcFyTzVunFp31AkoqL4+ZsGGX/L+VpHUs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxt97WFPYT6CbXU3aJQ2QVmWssHWWHoCrSsR3eaHZhuM3gTu0qwLJvmQvwzr/6FgudAZ9aUAXLGWwlW1iudqz4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1245:: with SMTP id t66mr10547921lje.18.1554565261238; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <010501d4e961$ddae8a90$990b9fb0$@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904021250150.14241@bofh.nohats.ca> <CADZyTknc_aDoNqrXE2vt1k6sA-rW+yx4uk2QpcS8kF3MMEq5pg@mail.gmail.com> <018301d4e9e3$31b831f0$952895d0$@gmail.com> <003701d4e9eb$a810d9d0$f8328d70$@nm.ifi.lmu.de> <01ce01d4e9ec$b4415080$1cc3f180$@gmail.com> <005a01d4ea1c$e25e9420$a71bbc60$@nm.ifi.lmu.de> <024a01d4ea1f$dccf35c0$966da140$@gmail.com> <CADZyTkkN98mL2+s94bwKx0b2EbWMM6L37nHXLTZmeEQgWi6dUQ@mail.gmail.com> <026101d4ea34$84d186b0$8e749410$@gmail.com> <CADZyTk=GB+FQuF5p0otTvUfAh1RtNqo=FsDcChmJ46VD2ysXeA@mail.gmail.com> <02c901d4eaa9$f0c3e690$d24bb3b0$@gmail.com> <23719.38572.739461.89978@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <23719.38572.739461.89978@fireball.acr.fi>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 11:40:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmnB6rpzrKNHCk7rO_OZ8Xazh9o-wOyQrxBnXp1k5Ur0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Cc: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Tobias Guggemos <guggemos@nm.ifi.lmu.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d25820585de6e65"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/xlzNVIPNmLwufcmMcMNw4QXzW9Q>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-implicit-iv-06 - key length is missing
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:41:05 -0000

Just submitted thank you all for your comments and suggestions!
Yours,
Daniel

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:58 PM Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:

> Valery Smyslov writes:
> > > One additional question came to my mind on whether we update the
> > > RFC mentioned above or not. We could consider our document as an
> > > alternate mechanism to generate the IV of the existing RFC.
> >
> > No, since you define your own transforms (with own code points) you
> > don’t need to update those RFCs.
>
> I agree on that, and I think the new text is good, please submit new
> updated version.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>