Re: [IPsec] Informal poll on IKEv2 { over TCP | fragmentation }

"Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <svanru@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C226311E812A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.303
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DOS_OE_TO_MX=2.75, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id me0aaRJx9fyu for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE00C11E8129 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fs12so2432410lab.39 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=o5V+ZXJzlUzSGFr2Wy5GFTXEnqsaeTTuwhCGmVDeTqY=; b=JBacIEJVA1YuJrsurv0+aVuOlj+XVo1Hpw4VHL2pqQDcBC9FlUvkTBSUZvS5OWj72l 8R8GgX6MoyXZafbpzVlUdSwp2xeprS8/w6m+1CbQRIQ9/8bTs6+YLoACBOaYC9ijOlkS R0Y7z/jg7upmxKvx1k/kN6APTJ1bObm1W4WLR7ZrHc8riD976heKmEel4Q7T+wOATGa4 8bPMwGlUeZ8bvneD+dQBOVTuQkvvDHIjZPLKHqYOzulMeNG0PY0Z8M4aRRABWcIU63Hm nMeYvKtmNpbFZR9llHINBwWWtFYeQkaknN8yZ+bpHUcr+3oy+NCYkUfG2+LHqLVtDVNb 4Xzw==
X-Received: by 10.152.110.167 with SMTP id ib7mr2263159lab.22.1363268518792; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buildpc ([93.188.44.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm841679lbm.10.2013.03.14.06.41.56 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <720945E8E0AB4F3185144CF28437ECEE@buildpc>
From: "Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com>
To: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "IPsecme WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <20799.34490.611737.922474@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <AF3F21AE-8695-47FC-BC41-4097635D0C95@vpnc.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:42:10 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Informal poll on IKEv2 { over TCP | fragmentation }
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:42:00 -0000

> - I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work 
> on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation

I vote for this option.

Valery.