ISAKMP Questions
WaterhouseR <WaterhouseR@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com> Fri, 01 November 1996 14:14 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa03065; 1 Nov 96 9:14 EST
Received: from neptune.hq.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10052; 1 Nov 96 9:14 EST
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa01489; 1 Nov 96 8:26 EST
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:28:09 -0400
From: WaterhouseR <WaterhouseR@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
Subject: ISAKMP Questions
To: IPSEC Working Group <ipsec@tis.com>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-MS 3.0.2
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <9611010807.aa01477@neptune.TIS.COM>
The following is based on draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-05. 1. Since my application is not Internet, I will need to define a different DOI. IPSEC AH and IPSEC ESP are not relevant. Nevertheless, I see no reason to unnecessarily deviate re ISAKMP. Do the ISAKMP Proposal Formats exist anywhere - right now A.7.4 is empty. Figure 18 does provide some information (why is Protocol # (value=1) rather than value=3). But I can't identify what the ISAKMP Transform ID values are. Nor do I know how to populate the 32 bit fields defined in A.6.3 (plus "Group Identifier" seems to be undefined). 2. In places where you say "Values ... are reserved for private use." I'm assuming it's OK to select values from this range as long as I document this usage in my DOI. Do I go to IANA to get a DOI identifier ? 3. While I don't see this explicitly stated, I'm assuming I can define additional Notify Message Types within a DOI. (The alternative would be to define additional Payloads within the DOI.) Is any guidance available on the best values to use should this be done ?
- ISAKMP Questions WaterhouseR
- Re: ISAKMP questions W. Douglas Maughan