RE: replay field size -Reply
CJ Lee <CJ_LEE@novell.com> Wed, 12 February 1997 18:11 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa09924; 12 Feb 97 13:11 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27753; 12 Feb 97 13:11 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id NAA27837 for ipsec-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 13:01:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <s30195f1.094@novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:04:46 -0800
From: CJ Lee <CJ_LEE@novell.com>
To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: RE: replay field size -Reply
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
> Should AH and ESP both have a fixed size replay counter ? (Yes/No/Don't Care) Yes. > If they have a fixed size counter, what size should it be? (32 bits/64 bits) 32 bits. > Should SHA-1 output be truncated to 128 bits from 160 bits ? (Yes/No/Don't Care) Don't care (don't have enough knowledge to judge). In the case of 64-bits header alignment, whether it's necessitated by the optional RP counter or the length of the MAC digest, trailing pad bytes can be used.
- RE: replay field size -Reply CJ Lee