RE:Packet-by-packet compression within IPSec

RIITTINEN HEIKKI <heikki.riittinen@fin1401.icl.fi> Mon, 25 November 1996 12:32 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa00278; 25 Nov 96 7:32 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14513; 25 Nov 96 7:26 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id HAA10567 for ipsec-outgoing; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 07:18:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 09:27:26 +0300
From: RIITTINEN HEIKKI <heikki.riittinen@fin1401.icl.fi>
Subject: RE:Packet-by-packet compression within IPSec
Reply-To: heikki.riittinen@icl.fi
In-Reply-To: Packet-by-packet compression within IPSec
Message-Id: <9611250927.aa26@fin1401.icl.fi>
To: ipsec@tis.com, rmonsour@earthlink.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Bob Monsour:
>MY PROPOSAL
>
>The essence of my proposal is to add simple, straightforward language
>(provided below) to the ESP draft which allows compression to be performed
>on a packet-by-packet basis (keeping *NO* history or state information
>across packets). The use of compression would be negotiated as an security
>association parameter along with the algorithm to be employed. The ESP
>payload data would simply be either compressed or uncompressed and *NO*
>additional fields (in the header *OR* in the payload) would be required to
>support it. This is the simplest form of compression support. 

>Bob Monsour
>rmonsour@earthlink.net

I fully support the proposal. We have implemented a prototype
of a proprietary "encryption" (stateless compression and standard
encryption) that fulfills all the requirements set by the proposal.

Heikki.Riittinen@teamw.com from Europe