[IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

Thanks for your work on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis.  I reviewed the
draft and just have a few questions, the first is a nit.


Nit:
In the second paragraph of 1.3, you can drop the last two words of this
sentence as they are redundant:

   This document does not give any recommendations for the use of
   algorithms, it only gives implementation recommendations for
   implementations.



In section 3.2 & 3.3, why isn't there a bigger jump down to SHOULD or
SHOULD- for:

PRF_HMAC_SHA1     | MUST-    |

| AUTH_HMAC_SHA1_96      | MUST-

The justifications seems like a bigger jump would be appropriate.


Thank you!

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen