Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions
Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com> Thu, 31 October 1996 18:03 UTC
Received: from relay.hq.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa02033; 31 Oct 96 13:03 EST
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id NAA01727; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:06:57 -0500
Received: from clipper.hq.tis.com(10.33.1.2) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001704; Thu, 31 Oct 96 13:06:36 -0500
Received: from relay.hq.tis.com (firewall-user@relay.hq.tis.com [10.33.1.1]) by clipper.hq.tis.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA13697 for <ipsec@tis.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: by relay.hq.tis.com; id NAA01683; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:06:29 -0500
Received: from capone.ch.apollo.hp.com(15.254.24.3) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001657; Thu, 31 Oct 96 13:05:57 -0500
Received: from thunk.orchard.medford.ma.us (thunk.ch.apollo.hp.com) by capone.ch.apollo.hp.com id <AA245645234@capone.ch.apollo.hp.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:07:14 -0500
Received: from thunk (sommerfeld@localhost) by thunk.orchard.medford.ma.us (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA00482; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:06:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199610311806.NAA00482@thunk.orchard.medford.ma.us>
X-Authentication-Warning: thunk.orchard.medford.ma.us: sommerfeld owned process doing -bs
To: Hilarie Orman <ho@earth.hpc.org>
Cc: msabin@netcom.com, ipsec@TIS.COM
Subject: Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions
In-Reply-To: ho's message of Thu, 31 Oct 1996 09:50:25 -0500. <199610311450.JAA02288@earth.hpc.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:06:52 -0500
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
> Isn't stateful compression most logically done as a separate > protocol, performed prior to any IPSEC encryption? Maybe from a "purity of layers" perspective, but stateful compression requires similar message-sequencing goop as replay detection; there are likely some real efficiencies from handling both at the same time.. - Bill
- proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Stephen Kent
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions David Wagner
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Ran Atkinson
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Hilarie Orman
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions pau
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Michael Sabin
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Stephen Kent
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions pau
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions pau
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Santeri Paavolainen
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Rodney Thayer
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Santeri Paavolainen
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Stephen Kent
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions David Wagner
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Steven Bellovin
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions Michael Sabin
- Re: proposed IPSEC changes/extensions John Gilmore