RE: replay field size straw poll

"Luis A. Sanchez" <lsanchez@bbn.com> Thu, 13 February 1997 14:12 UTC

Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970213140714.006bea60@bullwinkle.bbn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 09:07:14 -0500
To: rja@inet.org, palamber@us.oracle.com
From: "Luis A. Sanchez" <lsanchez@bbn.com>
Subject: RE: replay field size straw poll
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

>Should AH and ESP both have a fixed size replay counter ? (Yes/No/Don't Care)
> If they have a fixed size counter, what size should it be? (32 bits/64 bits)

-Fixed size, 32 bits. 

> Should SHA-1 output be truncated to 128 bits from 160 bits ? (Yes/No/Don't
Care)

- Yes.

Luis

RE: replay field size straw poll David P. Kemp
RE: replay field size straw poll Stephen Kent
Re: replay field size straw poll Steven M. Bellovin
RE: replay field size straw poll Robert Glenn
RE: replay field size straw poll Naganand Doraswamy
RE: replay field size straw poll Rob Adams
Re: replay field size straw poll Stephen Kent
RE: replay field size straw poll Luis A. Sanchez
RE: replay field size straw poll wei