Re: is manual keying mandatory

Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com> Mon, 23 March 1998 22:39 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id RAA26636 for ipsec-outgoing; Mon, 23 Mar 1998 17:39:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3516E69B.F369012@ire-ma.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 17:47:55 -0500
From: Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com>
Reply-To: bkavsan@ire-ma.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Carrel <carrel@ipsec.org>
CC: Steve Sneddon <sned@cisco.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
References: <199803232240.OAA28802@weenie.redbacknetworks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Dave Carrel wrote:

> We all know why manual keying doesn't scale and we
> all know why it's impractical in most real world situations.

Just admitting this makes this MUST a big joke....As far as the danger of delaying
the documents - I agree - we shouldn't delay.
--
Bronislav Kavsan
IRE Secure Solutions, Inc.
100 Conifer Hill Drive  Suite 513
Danvers, MA  01923
voice: 978-739-2384
http://www.ire.com