[IPsec] Cert-related IKEv2-bis issues
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Tue, 24 November 2009 17:09 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FB73A6847 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2a35+a3Y7MS for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667993A6944 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id nAOH9JGo011035 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:09:19 +0200 (IST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:09:25 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:09:23 +0200
Thread-Topic: Cert-related IKEv2-bis issues
Thread-Index: AcptJVrbQZECNxBHRGKbZNTYuxjneA==
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF88DFFDF@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF88DFFDFilex01adche_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [IPsec] Cert-related IKEv2-bis issues
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:09:28 -0000
Hi, Since we didn't have time to discuss these issues in Hiroshima, I'd like to reopen them on the list. Please refer to my slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/slides/ipsecme-7.pdf for a summary of the issues. This message will be followed by a restatement of each of the 5 issues. Our intention (believe it or not) is to start WG last call on IKEv2-bis Real Soon Now, but we want to have these issues closed before we do so. Thanks, Yaron
- [IPsec] Cert-related IKEv2-bis issues Yaron Sheffer